stream: use the ring buffer for WHATWG stream request queues

[mcollina]

The [[queue]] backing the controllers is now a ring buffer, but the read/write request queues (readRequests, readIntoRequests, writeRequests) were left as plain arrays consumed with ArrayPrototypeShift. Back them with the same Queue, materialized lazily from the shared empty queue so acquiring a reader or constructing a writer allocates no request storage until a read/write parks.

pipe-to: +4.7% to +9.4% (all 16 configs, ***)
readable-read type=byob: +2.3% (**)
parked reader.read() loop: +15%, writer.write() loop: +11% (local harness)

Follow-up to #64312.

[mertcanaltin]

Need a signature for first commit message.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 90.23%. Comparing base (8a3b11c) to head (e65f9be).
⚠️ Report is 17 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main   #64431      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   90.24%   90.23%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         741      741              
  Lines      241384   241391       +7     
  Branches    45480    45487       +7     
==========================================
- Hits       217844   217827      -17     
- Misses      15097    15129      +32     
+ Partials     8443     8435       -8     

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
lib/internal/webstreams/readablestream.js	98.19% <100.00%> (+<0.01%)	⬆️
lib/internal/webstreams/util.js	97.71% <100.00%> (+<0.01%)	⬆️
lib/internal/webstreams/writablestream.js	99.50% <100.00%> (+<0.01%)	⬆️

... and 40 files with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[nodejs-github-bot]

CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/74761/

[github-actions]

Benchmark GHA (webstreams): https://github.com/nodejs/node/actions/runs/29233460863

Results

[!WARNING]
Do not take GHA benchmark results as face value, always confirm them
using a dedicated machine, e.g. Jenkins CI.

Benchmark results:

                                                                       confidence improvement accuracy (*)    (**)   (***)
webstreams/creation.js kind='ReadableStream.tee' n=50000                               0.64 %       ±6.98%  ±9.19% ±11.80%
webstreams/creation.js kind='ReadableStream' n=50000                                   0.75 %       ±7.98% ±10.51% ±13.49%
webstreams/creation.js kind='ReadableStreamBYOBReader' n=50000                         3.30 %       ±6.13%  ±8.08% ±10.36%
webstreams/creation.js kind='ReadableStreamDefaultReader' n=50000                      1.63 %       ±7.61% ±10.03% ±12.86%
webstreams/creation.js kind='TransformStream' n=50000                                 -0.51 %       ±7.00%  ±9.23% ±11.84%
webstreams/creation.js kind='WritableStream' n=50000                                  -0.63 %       ±7.84% ±10.33% ±13.26%
webstreams/js_transfer.js n=10000 payload='ReadableStream'                            -0.43 %       ±9.64% ±12.71% ±16.30%
webstreams/js_transfer.js n=10000 payload='TransformStream'                            0.77 %       ±9.28% ±12.23% ±15.70%
webstreams/js_transfer.js n=10000 payload='WritableStream'                             0.83 %       ±9.45% ±12.46% ±15.98%
webstreams/pipe-to.js highWaterMarkW=1024 highWaterMarkR=1024 n=500000          *      7.38 %       ±7.34%  ±9.68% ±12.42%
webstreams/pipe-to.js highWaterMarkW=1024 highWaterMarkR=2048 n=500000          *      8.21 %       ±7.21%  ±9.51% ±12.20%
webstreams/pipe-to.js highWaterMarkW=1024 highWaterMarkR=4096 n=500000          *      7.71 %       ±7.29%  ±9.61% ±12.33%
webstreams/pipe-to.js highWaterMarkW=1024 highWaterMarkR=512 n=500000                  7.03 %       ±7.25%  ±9.56% ±12.27%
webstreams/pipe-to.js highWaterMarkW=2048 highWaterMarkR=1024 n=500000          *      7.39 %       ±7.26%  ±9.57% ±12.28%
webstreams/pipe-to.js highWaterMarkW=2048 highWaterMarkR=2048 n=500000          *      8.57 %       ±7.26%  ±9.57% ±12.28%
webstreams/pipe-to.js highWaterMarkW=2048 highWaterMarkR=4096 n=500000          *      7.49 %       ±7.15%  ±9.43% ±12.10%
webstreams/pipe-to.js highWaterMarkW=2048 highWaterMarkR=512 n=500000           *      7.74 %       ±7.29%  ±9.61% ±12.33%
webstreams/pipe-to.js highWaterMarkW=4096 highWaterMarkR=1024 n=500000          *      7.58 %       ±7.30%  ±9.62% ±12.35%
webstreams/pipe-to.js highWaterMarkW=4096 highWaterMarkR=2048 n=500000          *      9.04 %       ±7.43%  ±9.80% ±12.57%
webstreams/pipe-to.js highWaterMarkW=4096 highWaterMarkR=4096 n=500000          *      9.27 %       ±7.45%  ±9.82% ±12.61%
webstreams/pipe-to.js highWaterMarkW=4096 highWaterMarkR=512 n=500000           *      8.51 %       ±7.42%  ±9.78% ±12.55%
webstreams/pipe-to.js highWaterMarkW=512 highWaterMarkR=1024 n=500000           *      7.52 %       ±7.21%  ±9.51% ±12.20%
webstreams/pipe-to.js highWaterMarkW=512 highWaterMarkR=2048 n=500000           *      8.04 %       ±7.35%  ±9.68% ±12.42%
webstreams/pipe-to.js highWaterMarkW=512 highWaterMarkR=4096 n=500000           *      8.19 %       ±7.32%  ±9.64% ±12.38%
webstreams/pipe-to.js highWaterMarkW=512 highWaterMarkR=512 n=500000                   6.34 %       ±7.18%  ±9.46% ±12.14%
webstreams/readable-async-iterator.js type='bytes' n=100000                            4.92 %       ±9.89% ±13.04% ±16.73%
webstreams/readable-async-iterator.js type='normal' n=100000                           0.64 %       ±7.19%  ±9.47% ±12.15%
webstreams/readable-read-buffered.js bufferSize=1 n=100000                            -0.84 %       ±6.44%  ±8.48% ±10.89%
webstreams/readable-read-buffered.js bufferSize=10 n=100000                           -0.49 %       ±5.97%  ±7.87% ±10.10%
webstreams/readable-read-buffered.js bufferSize=100 n=100000                          -1.56 %       ±6.02%  ±7.94% ±10.18%
webstreams/readable-read-buffered.js bufferSize=1000 n=100000                         -0.08 %       ±6.24%  ±8.23% ±10.56%
webstreams/readable-read.js type='byob' n=100000                                       0.48 %       ±7.52%  ±9.91% ±12.72%
webstreams/readable-read.js type='normal' n=100000                             **      7.82 %       ±5.83%  ±7.69%  ±9.87%

Be aware that when doing many comparisons the risk of a false-positive
result increases. In this case, there are 33 comparisons, you can thus
expect the following amount of false-positive results:
  1.65 false positives, when considering a   5% risk acceptance (*, **, ***),
  0.33 false positives, when considering a   1% risk acceptance (**, ***),
  0.03 false positives, when considering a 0.1% risk acceptance (***)

[!WARNING]
Do not take GHA benchmark results as face value, always confirm them
using a dedicated machine, e.g. Jenkins CI.

[nodejs-github-bot]

Landed in ace91de