Skip to content

BugFixes For CSTACKEX-176, CSTACKEX-172, CSTACKEX-199 and CSTACKEX-181#65

Merged
suryag1201 merged 4 commits into
mainfrom
bugfix/CSTACKEX-176
Jun 22, 2026
Merged

BugFixes For CSTACKEX-176, CSTACKEX-172, CSTACKEX-199 and CSTACKEX-181#65
suryag1201 merged 4 commits into
mainfrom
bugfix/CSTACKEX-176

Conversation

@suryag1201

@suryag1201 suryag1201 commented Jun 19, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Description

This PR...
CSTACKEX-176: Storage Pool Backend by ONTAP FlexVolume is not Thin Provisioned
CSTACKEX-172: VM create failure due to aggrs not available and UI says "Unable to orchestrate the start of VM instance"
CSTACKEX-199: Error message when cluster password is wrong while creating primary storage pool is not user intuitive
CSTACKEX-181: Multiple host with same hostname will not follow per host igroup design

Types of changes

  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • Enhancement (improves an existing feature and functionality)
  • Cleanup (Code refactoring and cleanup, that may add test cases)
  • Build/CI
  • Test (unit or integration test code)

Feature/Enhancement Scale or Bug Severity

Feature/Enhancement Scale

  • Major
  • Minor

Bug Severity

  • BLOCKER
  • Critical
  • Major
  • Minor
  • Trivial

Screenshots (if appropriate):

Screenshot 2026-06-18 at 2 33 52 PM image image

How Has This Been Tested?

1- Create a storage pool with invalid ontap cred - throw the error
2- Create a storage pool with valid ontap cred - success
3- Verify Ontap Volume - thin provisioned
4- VM instance VM1 creation - suceess and igroup created with cs_svmName_hostUUID
5- VM instance VM2 creation - reused the same igroup
6- VM instance VM1 and VM2 delete - igroup also got deleted

How did you try to break this feature and the system with this change?

@suryag1201 suryag1201 changed the title BugFixes For CSTACKEX-176, CSTACKEX-172, CSTACKEX-199 BugFixes For CSTACKEX-176, CSTACKEX-172, CSTACKEX-199 and CSTACKEX-181 Jun 19, 2026
@suryag1201 suryag1201 merged commit b42f1ca into main Jun 22, 2026
19 checks passed
@piyush5netapp piyush5netapp added the cherry-pick for upstream PR This commit should be cherry-picked to upstream PR if raised. label Jul 9, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

cherry-pick for upstream PR This commit should be cherry-picked to upstream PR if raised.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants